The following candidate responses have been received: 

Tiffany Ashdown:

1. I strongly support the 2026 Bike Plan. However, I note the Council’s reference to the potential for increased bike uptake by women, yet the plan lacks statements on how it will enable this cohort. 2. As a cyclist, I’d personally like to see intersection projects be prioritised. 3. I would support bike lanes if it meant moving and/or reducing some on-street car parking. I would also like to see any moves or reductions consider people who are aging, have caring responsibilities, and people living with disability. 29/07/26

Yang Liu:

1.I do not support. 2. I promote sharing the road and raising safety awareness. Hobart is not geographically ideal for cycling. It is good as a sport for people who enjoy it, but not for everyone. 3. I do not support.

Zelinda Sherlock:

1.Yes, I do, while understanding that adjustments may occur along the way. 2. As part of the Tasmanian Government’s: Walk, Wheel and Ride Strategy, released in June this year, there are a number of ways that the City of Hobart can collaborate to achieve some of what has been outlined in that Strategy, such as improved bicycle lanes, end of trip facilities and crossings. With 11.5% of Tasmanians riding a bicycle in a typical week, having the options to choose active transport could be harnessed to convert car trips under 2.5km. The Strategy also discusses outcomes, such as providing well-connected and well-designed wheeling and riding networks, as well as well-designed streets and public spaces. I would welcome suggestions put forward by the expert staff at the City of Hobart, in collaborating to make this possible. 3. Yes, in consultation with the community. 29/07/026

Ryan Posselt:

Follow this link for Ryan’s full position on bike riding in Hobart. 

Bill Harvey:

1. Yes, I support the council bike plan and expect it to be realised over time to create a city that is bike friendly and safe for riders of all ages and abilities. I have supported all bike related initiatives, plans and strategic documents since first being elected in 2007. 2. I wholeheartedly support the philosophy, direction and the focus of the plan for primary, secondary, neighbourhood and recreational routes. I support this structure and priority approach as per the majority decision of council. I support the development of detailed designs of the various priority routes as they are developed over-time. “While this plan does not define the future form of each corridor, project development will prioritise safety, comfort and connectivity for all ages and abilities. We will invest in a bike network that connects neighbourhoods to schools, parks and sportsgrounds, local activity centres and major destinations.” 3. I support the removal of parking spaces as required to deliver the objectives of the Council Bike Plans to provide safe, connected bike lanes for all ages and abilities. This may also require speed limit reductions. I also see this in the context of climate change, cost of car ownership and the cost-of-living crisis. Bike use, along with public transport use will increase as the cost of living continues to worsen and people seek affordable transport and mobility options. Safe bike lanes are essential. 31/07/26

AJ Humphries:

1. Absolutely. 2. I would prioritise the Augusta Road Better Streets project because it connects local schools, shops and neighbourhoods to the city, while making the area safer and more pleasant. I also see huge value in the potential walking and cycling connection around Battery Point.  Battery Point is the main waterfront area that is cut off from the public. Waterfront shared paths improve liveability. For quick wins, I would also support practical improvements that help people feel safe and confident riding. I’d prioritise better bike lane markings, safer crossings, improved signage, more bike parking and traffic calming in neighbourhoods.3. Yes, but only where the benefits are clear and there is genuine community consultation. 1/08/26

Trenton Hoare:

1. I fully support the 2026 Hobart Bike Plan and I cannot wait to see it fully implemented in the future! 2. As a Mount Nelson resident, I understand the anxiety that comes with using active transport in the area. I would prioritise all projects but would have a special interest in our mountainous suburbs so all residents can have the option to safely utilise active transport across our city, no matter where they live. 3. Yes but only alongside in depth community consultation and supported by excellent planning and design. 11/8/26

Suzie Schulz:

The following candidate responses have been received: 

BJ Walker:

1. I’m supportive of the current cycling strategy Clarence has in place but wouldn’t like new ideas restricted by it. 2. Kangaroo Bay Rivulet Track is a priority one for me, this should be done as a proper paved, shared-use commuter and recreational path linking the Foreshore Trail to Eastlands, Warrane, Mornington and the Meehan Range Mountain Bike Park which could then go on to link with Pass Rd. As Pass Rd and the South Arm Highway commences construction soon, I will be watchful that the track along here is done right to promote proper commuting along both these tracks. The Foreshore Trail is Clarence’s gold when it comes to our cycling network and once again I’m keen to see further upgrades like the ones its currently having and its extension to Droughty Point. As part of the Rokeby Hills Landcare Group, I’m also currently advocating on formalising and bringing many well used mountain bike tracks within the reserve into council ownership. 3. Clarence has been gifted with open space opportunities to create good working cycling network without the need for reducing or removing on street parking for bikes lanes. 29/07/26

Brendan Blomely:

1.I am conscious of the need to support active transport opportunities within the City of Clarence, and I was delighted to support the Clarence Cycling Strategy 2025-2035 when it was adopted at our meeting of 7 July 2025. 2. Clarence is spoilt with a popular range of tracks and trails across our city that cater for walkers, bicycle riders, mountain bike riders, and horse riders. As one of Tasmania’s fastest growing municipalities with people choosing to live here because of the extraordinary lifestyle we offer, we must ensure we keep pace with this growth and continue to expand our network of tracks and trails.In addition, there are 16 key actions identified in our 10-year cycling strategy, including “Action 10: Provide secure and appropriate bicycle parking”. Pleasingly, bicycle parking is now a requirement of all new developments.  In our recent collaborations with the Department of State Growth on their projects within the City of Clarence, bicycle parking and storage has been included in the Rokeby Park & Ride Project, the upgrade to the Bellerive Ferry Terminal and the development of a new Ferry Terminal at Natone Street, Lindisfarne and I will continue to advocate for inclusion of high standard bicycle storage facilities wherever possible. In addition, I am a passionate supporter of our City Heart Plan that was adopted in September 2025 and includes the specific goal of: “Create a continuous and robust network of active transport (bicycle, e-bike, and e-scooter) lanes including new and upgraded cycleways and increase the provision of micro-mobility parking and storage facilities at key destinations.” 3. The short answer, absolutely. 29/07/26

Zac Morrisby:

1. Yes. I support improving cycling infrastructure where it is practical, safe and represents good value for ratepayers. Clarence has some fantastic opportunities to expand recreational and commuter cycling, particularly by improving connections between existing paths, schools, shopping centres and transport hubs. Any investment should be evidence based and balanced alongside other community priorities. 2. My priority would be improving connectivity by filling gaps in the existing cycling network rather than creating isolated sections of infrastructure. I also support better links between cycling, park-and-ride facilities, and ferry services, as well as safer routes to schools and key community destinations. Well designed shared paths and safer crossings can benefit cyclists, pedestrians and families alike. 3. I don’t believe there is a one-size-fits-all answer. In many parts of Clarence, on-street parking is already under pressure, and removing parking can have significant impacts on local businesses, residents and families. I would assess each proposal on its merits, considering safety, traffic impacts, parking demand and community consultation. Where suitable alternatives exist and the overall community benefit is clear, I would support changes. However, I would not support removing important parking without a compelling case. I hope this answer the questions. Please feel free to reach out with any further questions. I’m actually a cyclist myself! I’ve competed in 2 Ironman 70.3’s, Hobart and Cairns, cycling is something that brings me a sense of freedom, and I know first hand the dangers on the road when riding a bicycle of any kind. 29/7/2

Carly Allen

1.Yes. I support the direction of Clarence City Council’s Cycling Strategy 2025–2035 and its goal of creating a safer, more connected and accessible cycling network for people of all ages and abilities. As a Greens candidate, I believe active transport should be an important part of Clarence’s future. Safe cycling infrastructure supports healthier communities, reduces transport emissions, eases cost-of-living pressures and creates more connected neighbourhoods. 2. I would prioritise projects that create safe, connected and practical everyday cycling options—not just recreational routes. Key priorities would include:

• Completing missing links in the cycling network so residents can safely travel between homes, schools, shops, workplaces, public transport and community facilities.
• Improving safety on key routes, particularly where cyclists currently share roads with higher-speed traffic.
• Supporting all-ages-and-abilities infrastructure, including safer crossings, protected cycling routes and better connections for children, families, older residents and people with mobility needs.
• Improving connections between Clarence communities, including links across suburbs and to key destinations such as shopping precincts, beaches, parks and services.
• Ensuring cycling is considered early in all future transport, planning and infrastructure projects.

3. Yes, where evidence shows this is the safest and most effective way to create a connected cycling network. Road space is a limited community asset, and we need to balance the needs of all users—including drivers, cyclists, pedestrians, people with disabilities, businesses and residents. Creating safer cycling infrastructure may sometimes require difficult decisions, including changes to parking arrangements. However, these decisions should be community-informed, carefully planned and consider local impacts. My goal is not to remove choice—it is to create more transport choices, so that more people can safely walk, ride, wheel or drive depending on their needs. A Clarence where people can safely ride to school, work, shops and recreation is a healthier, more connected and more resilient community. 7/8/26

Rick Champion

John Alexiou:

1. Yes. I believe Devonport already has an excellent network of shared pathways. 2. I would like to see the remaining pathway links completed and existing paths well maintained, safe and accessible. As a former councillor, I also put forward a Notice of Motion supporting the development of a pump track in Devonport, so I have long been a strong supporter of cycling and recreational opportunities for our community. 3. Each proposal should be considered on its merits. I recognise the importance of both safe cycling infrastructure and convenient parking for local businesses, so any changes should involve proper community consultation. 29/07/26

Steve Martin:

As you might be aware, Council recently release a drat 5-year walking & cycling strategy for community consultation by 28^th May 2026. The Strategy was adopted by Council at its meeting 22^nd June 2026 – Devonport Walking & Riding Strategy 2026-31 | Devonport City Council. Additionally, am proud to highlight :

• Bike racks throughout the City
• Free bike repair station in Market Square – additionally, the Bicycle Network has provided an instructional video & information sheet on how to use the free tools available Bike riding and walking in Devonport | Devonport City Council– Plus
• Road Safety Park – Pioneer Park East Devonport, allowing children to ride their bike in a safe environment and to learn about the road rules 

In regard to your questions, I enthusiastically supported the Devonport Walking & Riding strategy 2026-2031 and its objectives. 1/8/26

Responses received:

Teeny Brumby:

1. Burnie City Council has adopted an Active Transport Strategy that aims to make walking, wheeling and riding safer, more accessible and better connected across our municipality. I support that strategic direction because it encourages healthier lifestyles, improves accessibility and provides people with more transport choices, while recognising Burnie has unique geographical challenges. 2. My priority is completing practical projects that improve connections between where people live and where they need to go. That includes safer shared pathways, better links to schools, parks and sporting facilities, and continuing to close gaps in our existing network. I also believe we should continue pursuing external grant funding wherever possible so we can deliver these improvements without placing unnecessary pressure on ratepayers. 3. Each proposal should be assessed on its own merits. In some locations, dedicated cycling infrastructure may be appropriate if it clearly improves safety and has strong community support. In other areas, retaining parking will remain important for residents and local businesses. My approach is to find practical, balanced solutions rather than applying a ‘one size fits all’ approach. Burnie is not a flat city, so our active transport network needs to be realistic and focus on the places where it will make the biggest difference to everyday life and recreation. 29/07/26

Craig Hensley:

1: I don’t know what the current council bike plan is but it sure as hell needs the connection from the Emu River to the Blythe River as a priority! 2: As I may have hinted at in answer 1, the missing link in the Burnie section of the Coastal pathway is a priority project for me. A proper link from the Coastal Pathway to Fern Glade could be a great option to look at as well and I also feel the current disused train line corridor around the Burnie Foreshore area would be a safer option than the current riding amongst the kids, surf members, diners and picnickers at the grassed area. 3: I cannot answer this one way or the other until I see a detailed plan. I mean what parking, what streets etc? 29/07/26

Paula Kirkpatrick

1) Yes I do support the Burnie Council bike plan. 2) I would prioritise the actioning of bike stands in the cbd to enable cyclists to secure their bikes enabling them to leave them unattended. 3) I do not support removing or reducing car parking spaces to replace with bike lanes. We have an aging population and disabled who need more, not less, easily accessible parking spaces close to shops. 3/8/26

Giovanna Simpson:

1: As you are obviously aware, we adopted our first active transport strategy with targeted our 2040 vision to build over 45km of new cycling and walking routes, connect transit paths to the Coastal Pathway and of course, install secure CBD bike parking. I definitely support the plan, because it prioritises safer paths and crossings for riders in the city centre and with a lot of people riding to work, this is a priority. It will also encourage more people to become active in our community. The work that has been done in this strategy, really captures the reasons behind the need for an active bike plan.2: I may have answered this one in question one. But making safer crossings or riders is fairly high for me. If we get this right, it means that we can encourage more people to choose either cycling or walking for everyday travel. Over the years, we have sadly lost cyclists on our roads. Prioritising our identified ‘black spots’ is also a priority for me. And making sure that we have resting areas along our key active routes that are shaded and easily accessible for people we need to support with disability needs and generally all age groups. We have to promote the benefits. Ensure people feel safe and ensure they have a safe space to leave there bike when they go shopping. 3: There are a few different reasons why i would support this, Firstly, it would provide a definite boost for foot traffic in our CBD. To some retailers, it can be seen as too much of a reduction in car parking at the front of their business. But when we are talking about protected bike lanes, that separate the two, it helps with cycle safety and lets be honest, shoppers that either walk or cycle, would probably shop more than those in a car. We are lucky in Burnie in many ways, and I believe that we are well equipped with off street alternatives when you look at the multi storey car park for example. We are not looking at every street, but we need to have bike lanes for both safety and practicality. If you look at a city like Brisbane, there are bicycle lanes all through the city and it works. 5/8/26

The following responses have been received

Jess Hoyle:

I don’t support bike lanes in the CBD. I also don’t support taking away parking spots from vehicles in an all ready congested city as Launceston. I have seen the issues in Hobart and I do not want them in Launceston. I do support bike tracks and bike lanes in the suburbs. 29/07/26

Matthew Garwood: